Category

Financial Independence

Category

The more time you spend in the financial independence community the more you’ll see the term savings rate thrown around. It is almost viewed like a sort of trophy that we can use to prove to ourselves and others how dedicated we are to achieving FIRE. It can also be used as a tool that allows us to forecast the time required to reach FIRE.

The problem that often arises when comparing savings rates with others is the fact that each person may choose to calculate their savings rate differently. On the surface, it’s a very simple calculation. You just divide your savings by your income to arrive at a percentage of income saved.

Savings / Income = % Savings Rate

It is largely personal preference as to which factors are included in your savings rate calculation. On the income side of the equation, the debate is largely between using net or gross income. On the savings side of the equation, you have savings accounts, retirement accounts, employer match on those retirement accounts and even the portion of your mortgage payment (or other loan payments) that goes toward the principal of the loan.

Why Do We Calculate Our Savings Rate?

Why are all of us in the financial independence community borderline obsessed with our savings rate? Is it really that important? 

The reason that we all love talking about our savings rate is that it allows us to create a timeline of when we will be able to retire. What it boils down to is the more money you are able to save, the sooner you will be able to retire.

The chart below illustrates just how impactful increasing your savings rate can be.

The math behind this chart assumes a few things. First, this assumes a starting net worth of zero and using net income for savings rate calculations (we’ll dive into this further). Second, you will earn a 5% inflation adjusted return. Third, you will use the 4% rule after retiring.

This is just a baseline to work off of, these assumptions will not work for everyone.

Abiding by our assumptions and looking at the chart, you can see that if you save 5% it will take you 66 years until you will be ready to retire. Up that 5% to 30% and you will cut your years to retirement down to 28 years. Up that 30% even further to 65% and you will cut your years to retirement down to 10.5 years. 

Knowing how soon we can achieve financial independence is the driving factor behind the coveted savings rate calculations.

Calculating Savings

The first step needed to calculate savings rate is to determine your savings. To do this we need to decide which pieces should be considered in these calculations. 

The easiest piece is, well, plain old savings. This could be money that goes into a savings account, checking account, cash, etc.

The next piece is money that goes into retirement accounts. This includes pre-tax retirement accounts as well as post-tax. 

This is where things begin to become personal preference. Retirement account contributions made by an employer could be included as savings. If you decide to count employer contributions as savings you should also count them on the income side as well. This will give you a more accurate savings rate. Here’s a few example scenarios in which Mary’s savings rate is calculated based only on her 401k. This means she is saving zero dollars anywhere else. This is probably not very likely, but it demonstrates the difference in savings rate percentages quite well.

Scenario 1: No Employer Contribution

Mary’s net income is $75,000 and she contributes $19,500 to her 401k. Her savings rate would be $19,500 / $75,000 = 26%. 

Scenario 2: $5,000 Employer Contribution Added Only to Savings

If she counted her employer’s contributions to her 401k on the savings side and not the income side her savings rate would be $24,500 / $75,000 = 32.67%.

Scenario 3: $5,000 Employer Contribution Added to Both Savings and Income

If she counted her employer’s contributions to her 401k on both the savings and the income side her savings rate would be $24,500 / $80,000 = 30.63%. This is the most accurate calculation of the three. 

The last potential savings to consider are any portion of loan payments that are going to the principal of the loan. This is often debated among the FI community. 

The argument for including this in your savings is that it is directly increasing your net worth by lowering your outstanding debt. The argument against this is that you will likely not see a 5% inflation adjusted return on this money, required by the assumptions in the savings rate chart. Though, if you had a loan at 7% and inflation remained at 2% or lower you would see a 5% inflation adjusted return.This could also include principal only payments that you may make towards a loan, not just the principal portion of a regular payment. Again, there is no right or wrong answer here it is just personal preference as to what you would like to include.

Full Calculation of Mary’s Savings

Let’s calculate Mary’s savings in entirety.

She is able to save $500 per month in her savings account.

She contributes $19,500 ($1,925 per month) into her 401(k) and receives $5,000 (~$417) employer match.

She contributes $100 per month into a Roth IRA.

She also pays $100 per month onto her mortgage principal. She has decided to exclude the principal portion of her mortgage payment and she has no other outstanding debts.

$500 savings account + $1,925 401(k) contribution + $417 employer 401(k) contribution + $100 Roth contribution +$100 extra principal payment  = $3,042 Total Monthly Savings.

Calculating Income 

Calculating our income does two main things for us. First, it allows us to figure out our total spending. Second, it gives us the last piece we need to finish calculating our savings rate. 

Our spending, in the simplest terms, is the difference between our income and our savings, right?

Income – Savings = Spending

We don’t need to know how much we are spending to calculate our savings rate. But, how much we spend is important because with this we can calculate how much we will need in investments to retire. The generally accepted formula is 25 times annual spending equals the amount needed to retire (assuming a 4% withdrawal rate, refer to the Trinity Study for specifics). 

For example, annual expenses of $40,000 x 25 = $1,000,000 needed in investments to retire. 

Now, when we talk about income we generally think pre-tax (gross) or post-tax (net). Depending which of these you choose will have a large impact on your perceived savings rate. 

This again will be personal preference, but I generally advocate for using net income. Your savings rate will be higher using this method because you take taxes out of the equation. Taxes are a sort of forced spending and you can’t control this, or save what you are paying in taxes. To me, this makes more sense because it allows you to achieve a savings rate of 100%. If you were to use gross income the highest possible savings rate you could achieve would be 100% minus taxes. 

Remember, you may have to make some adjustments for your 401(k), if applicable. You will need to add your contributions back to your income as well as your employer match, if you are going to include that on the savings side.

After you decide between gross and net income you will need to take into consideration all other forms of you income you might have. This could be interest, dividends, side-hustles, etc. 

We’ll refer back to Mary for another example.

We know that she nets $75,000 per year from her job ($6,250 per month),

Contributes $19,500 ($1,625 per month) to her 401(k) and receives a $5,000 ($417 per month) employer match.

She also earns $10 per month in interest

$100 per month from dividends.

$200 per month from side-hustles.

$6,250 monthly job income + $1,625 401(k) contribution + $417 employer 401(k) contribution + $10 interest + $100 dividends + $200 side hustles = $8,602 total monthly income. 

Putting It All Together

We now have all the pieces needed to calculate Amy’s savings rate. 

Mary’s Monthly Savings = $3,042

Mary’s Monthly Income = $8,602

Amy’s Savings Rate = $3,042 / $8,602 = 35.36%. A savings rate of 35% puts Amy at 25 years until retirement, assuming she has a zero dollar net worth. 

I recommend calculating savings rate on a monthly basis. And at most, quarterly. Calculating your savings rate is one of those eye-opening things that can directly affect your actions going forward. If you are only calculating this annually and you then realize that you are way behind where you want to be, it is too late to make any changes for the year. If you calculate your savings rate monthly, you don’t risk wasting too much time not knowing where you stand. I find checking on this more frequently motivates me to not only maintain my current rate but also to try to find ways that I can improve as well.

What is your average savings rate?

Disclosure: We may receive a referral fee if you sign up with a service through a link on this page.

I use Personal Capital to track my net worth. It’s phenomenal, honestly. I login almost daily to keep an eye on things. If you want to check it out, use my link to sign-up here. (It’s free)

Books I’m currently enjoying:

While working towards financial independence $1,000,000 is often seen as a coveted milestone. This is a goal that can take a lifetime to achieve, but we know with a high savings rate this can be achieved much faster. Saving your first $100,000 is the hardest and takes the longest. Fortunately, each $100,000 after that becomes easier and comes faster. Compound interest becomes more and more impactful the larger your money grows. 

We all know that $100,000 is only 10% of $1,000,000. What’s more interesting, is what percentage of the total time taken to get to $1,000,000 is occupied by the first $100,000. We’ll look at the $300,000, $500,000 and $750,000 milestones as well.

$300,000 is Half of $1,000,000

If I told you that $100,000 is 25% of $1,000,000, or that $300,000 is 50% of 1,000,000, you would probably look at me like I’m crazy. You would inform me that $100,000 is 10% and $300,000 is 30%, respectively, of $1,000,000 and ask me what I’m talking about? 

What I should say is that $100,000 requires 25% of the total time that it takes to get to $1,000,000. And $300,000 requires 50% of the total time that it takes to get to $1,000,000. How is this possible? Compound interest! Take a look at the chart below:

$5,000$10,000$20,000$30,000Average
$100,00012.37 Years – 31.64%7.44 Years – 24.91%4.19 Years – 19.52%2.92 Years – 17.07%6.73 Years – 23.29%
$300,00023.57 Years – 60.28%16.06 Years – 53.77%10.11 Years – 47.11%7.44 Years – 43.48%14.30 Years – 51.16%
$500,00029.87 Years – 76.39%21.46 Years – 71.84%14.33 Years – 66.77%10.90 Years – 63.71%19.14 Years – 69.68%
$750,00035.19 Years – 90%26.26 Years – 87.91%18.32 Years – 85.37%14.33 Years – 83.75%23.53 Years – 86.76%
$1,000,00039.1 Years – 100%29.87 Years – 100%21.46 Years – 100%17.11 Years – 100%26.89 Years – 100%

The top lines of $5,000, $10,000, $20,000 and $30,000 represent amounts invested each year earning an annualized 7% return. The side columns of $100k, $300k, $500k, $750k and $1M represent investment milestones. 

The purpose of this chart is to illustrate how long it will take different annual investment amounts to hit each milestone, in years and what percentage of the total time to reach $1M each of these milestones will occupy. For example, looking at the $10,000 annual investment, it will take 7.44 years to reach $100,000 and 29.87 years to reach $1,000,000. The 7.44 years that it took to reach $100,000 was a total of 24.91% of the total time of 29.87 years it would require to reach $1,000,000. Making $100,000 25% of 1,000,000! In the same $10,000 column, it would take 53.77% of the total time required to reach $300,000. This means that half of your time would be spent earning the first $300,000 and you would earn the next $700,000 in that same amount of time! This is what I meant when I said that $300,000 is half of $1,000,000.

Average

I took the average between each of the annual investment amounts time and percentage required to reach each milestone. With that information I created the chart below:

This chart illustrates how much faster each milestone past $100,000 is reached. You can notice how much flatter the line to $100,000 is compared to the rest of the milestones. The averages worked out to be 6.73 years – 23.29% to $100,000, 14.30 years – 51.16% to $300,000, 19.14 years – 69.68% to $500,000, 23.53 years – 86.76% to $750,000 and 26.89 years to $1,000,000. 

Sign up for Webull using my referral link and we’ll both receive free stocks! https://a.webull.com/md1teo8ICIGh5jKKLs

Using these averages, it took 6.73 years to reach $100,000. Another 7.57 years to reach $300,000. Just another 4.83 years to reach $500,000. Only another 4.39 years to reach $750,000. Finally, another 3.36 years to reach $1,000,000. The difference is pretty remarkable. It took 6.73 years to accumulate the first $100,000 but only 3.36 years to accumulate the final $250,000.

Conclusion

The power of compound interest is incredible. The sooner you can let it start working for you the sooner you can achieve financial independence. Each milestone will come exponentially sooner than the last. Hustle and grind to your first $100,000 so that your journey becomes easier!  Tell all your friends that $300,000 is half of $1,000,000 and let me know the crazy remarks that they give you before you explain!

Disclosure: We may receive a referral fee if you sign up with a service through a link on this page.

Check out Personal Capital to track your net worth. It’s phenomenal, honestly. I login almost daily to keep an eye on things. If you want to check it out, use my link to sign-up here. (It’s free)

What I’m currently reading:

Financial independence is a goal that many of us share. Although it is a common desire, many are unaware of the most efficient way to achieve this goal. We all remember the saying “Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally” and the accompanying acronym PEMDAS while taking algebra in high school. Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition and Subtraction. While solving an algebraic equation one must follow this order of operations to arrive at the correct answer. If one step is done incorrectly, it can throw the whole equation into a tailspin. For example, 2 x 4 + 2 = 10, but it would be very easy to arrive at an incorrect answer of 12 by adding before multiplying.

Financial independence can be viewed in a similar way. There is a certain “order of operations” that should be followed, to protect yourself and use your money most efficiently. We do not want to throw our finances into a tailspin. I’m going to call the financial independence order of operations TEFHIDI, Track Expenses/Emergency Fund, High Interest Debt, Invest. This is the advice that I would give to anyone who wants to start their journey to FI, has already started and isn’t sure where to go next or anyone who wants to achieve FI in the most efficient way.

Understanding FI

Financial independence (FI) is often used synonymously with early retirement. Though they aren’t the same thing, one does allow the other to occur. In its most basic form, retirement is a state that is achieved when you do not work and your passive income exceeds your expenses. Financial independence, on the other hand, has nothing to do with whether you are working or not. It is solely the state in which your passive income exceeds your expenses.

This distinction is important because becoming financially independent will allow you to retire early. It gives you the ability to dictate your future. Don’t like your job? Quit. Want to work somewhere fulfilling, for little pay? Do it. Never want to work another day of your life? Your choice. These are the steps to make it a reality.

Track Expenses and Save An Emergency Fund “TEF”

The first step to financial independence is to have an emergency fund saved. This is typically 3-6 months of expenses saved in liquid assets. This can be a high yield savings account, checking account, cash, etc. Having an emergency fund saved will allow life to happen, which it inevitably will, without throwing you off track too dramatically. If and when life does happen and you need to dip into your emergency fund to pay for the situation at hand (lost job, car broke down, hospital bills or any other unexpected expense) you should immediately focus on building your emergency fund back up to previous levels.

Before you are able to save 3-6 months of expenses for your emergency fund, you’ll need to know what your monthly expenses are. This is not a one time calculation and will need to be updated periodically as your situation changes. I use the notes feature on my smartphone to quickly write down the date, amount and a quick one or two word description of each of my expenses (and any income). At the end of each month I use these notes to fill in a spreadsheet that categorizes my expenses (and income). This method works for me, but it isn’t the only method. The key is to find a method that you are able to stick to long term. Once you know your monthly expenses multiply that number by 3-6 to determine the size of your emergency fund. However you choose to track your expenses, do it consistently and make it a habit so you are aware of changes that may need to be applied to your emergency fund.

The 3-6 month recommendation is simply that, a recommendation. You may feel comfortable with three months of expenses saved, or you may not feel comfortable until you have nine months of expenses saved. This is entirely a personal preference. The only scenario to be weary of is if you have a massive emergency fund. This is inefficient because your emergency fund will typically earn less money than if it were invested.

The last emergency fund point I want to bring up is the difference between a slim and a fat emergency fund. Both of these distinctions, slim and fat, are still going to fall within the basic recommendation of 3-6 months of expenses. The difference between the two is which categorization of expenses is used. A slim emergency fund consists of 3-6 months of necessary expenses. A fat emergency fund consists of 3-6 months of total expenses. The premise behind the slim emergency fund is that if you encountered a life changing situation like losing your job, you would cut back on all unnecessary expenses for the next 3-6 months or until you found a new job or remedied the pressing issue. This allows for more money invested in the hopes for larger potential growth. The approach that I prefer, is the more conservative fat emergency fund. If I were to lose my job while utilizing this approach I would be able to maintain my current lifestyle for those 3-6 months while looking for a new job. Meaning my total expenses, not just my necessary expenses are covered by my emergency fund. To take that even further, I could extend the life of my emergency fund past those 3-6 months by cutting unnecessary expenses during this time.

Tracking your net worth is not necessary but it is a good gauge on your progress and allows you to visualize changes that you are making, whether negative or positive. I use Personal Capital to track my net worth. It’s phenomenal, honestly. I login almost daily to keep an eye on things. If you want to check it out, use my link to sign-up here. (It’s free)

Pay High Interest Debt “HID”

Once you have established a suitable emergency fund for your preference and needs, it’s time to tackle debt. There are an infinite number of different opinions on this one. Some people despise debt in any form. Others will only tolerate debt if it is a mortgage or a home equity loan. I tend to disagree with both of these opinions.

I think debt is a valuable tool that when used appropriately can help you build wealth and achieve your goal of financial independence. That being said, debt can also be detrimental to your success. As a general rule of thumb, I consider “high interest debt” to be any debt that is 7% or higher.

I generally tend to be conservative in my investment growth calculations. Given this fact, I like to use 7% as an expected rate of return for investments. If a debt is matching my low end investment growth expectations of 7% then there is no gain or loss by investing or paying the debt. If a debt is above my low end growth expectations, above 7% that is, then I theoretically would be losing money by investing and not paying that debt. The difference between debt and growth expectations, is that by paying debt (assuming fixed rate) it is a guaranteed rate of return. Your investments may return 12%, 3% or they may even lose money. So when given the choice between a guaranteed 7%+ return by paying debt or a possible negative return by investing, I choose to take the guaranteed return. Change the 7% debt to 6% and I would rather invest that money.

I like to think of debt from a tiered approach. Anything from 1-4% should be ignored and minimum payments made. Anything 5-7% can be paid or not, based on personal preference and risk tolerance. Anything above 7% should be paid off immediately.

So for the next step in the order of operations, abiding by the 7% rule, is to pay any debt that has an interest rate of 7% or higher. There are plenty of debt reduction strategies out there to choose from. Two of the most common are the debt snowball method and the debt avalanche method. The snowball method is more of an emotional strategy while the avalanche is a math driven approach. The more efficient method between the two is the debt avalanche.

When possible, it may make sense to refinance high interest debt rather than paying it off. This depends on a few different factors, which we won’t get into here.

The last point I want to talk about regarding debt is the fear to reintroduce debt. Once debt is paid, many are afraid to utilize debt going forward. Opportunities to increase wealth often present themselves in ways that simply cannot be cash flowed. By utilizing debt, you can take advantage of these wealth building opportunities. If you do find yourself in a position where you have reintroduced debt, use the 7% rule to determine what to do with this newly acquired debt. If 7%+, get rid of it, if below 7%, leave it.

Invest “I”

The final piece to the financial independence order of operations is to invest. This can be done in tons of different ways and with different objectives in mind. The two major objectives for financial independence will be wealth accumulation and wealth preservation. The goal of this article is to create a path to achieving FI, with that in mind we are going to focus on wealth accumulation. Wealth preservation is something that becomes relevant after achieving FI. The general goal of wealth accumulation is to increase capital to the point where it is viable to live off 4% of the portfolio per year (also known as the 4% rule, which will be discussed further down).

The “VTSAX and chill” methodology has been accepted by many, myself included. VTSAX is a total stock market index fund offered by Vanguard, there are other similar options offered by other brokers as well, such as Fidelity’s FSKAX. These index funds track the entire stock market giving you exposure to the entire U.S. equity market at an extremely low cost. The “chill” aspect of this methodology is where the strategy comes into play. Essentially, all you need to do to follow this method is to dollar cost average VTSAX (or something similar). You don’t try to buy low and sell high, you don’t implement some crazy day trading strategy. You simply buy VTSAX at consistent intervals. It is extremely simple and stress free, you need not panic if the market is down or worry that the market is too high, you buy and then “chill.” This allows you to continuously buy the market as a whole, with the idea that the market always maintains an upward trajectory over time. Over the course of the last 100 years, from 1919 to 2019, the average annual return of the stock market was about 9.4%.

It is extremely important to stay the course while following the VTSAX and chill approach. If you panic and sell when the market drops instead of purchasing more shares, you are missing an opportunity to buy in at a discount. JL Collins wrote a fantastic book called The Simple Path to Wealth that I highly recommend reading to gain a better understanding on this approach.

VTSAX is just one piece of the puzzle, though. There is another mini order of operations when it comes to investing. We have tax advantaged accounts such as 401k, 457b, 403b, HSAs and Roth IRAs. We also have non tax advantaged accounts such as a taxable brokerage account. The order in which you fund these accounts can have a dramatic effect on your long term wealth.

For simplicity sake, I’m going to lump 401k, 457b, and 403b together and refer to the three of them as 401k. They are all employer sponsored retirement accounts and similar enough for our purposes. The advantage of a 401k is that it is tax deferred. This type of account is funded directly from your paycheck, pre tax. This allows the maximum amount of your money to grow over time since you didn’t have to take a tax hit up front. Another large advantage to a 401k is there is often an employer match offered. This is essentially free money. The downside to a 401k is that you’ll pay tax on the money you withdraw in retirement. Because of these reasons, this is the first account you should utilize and max out. The 401k annual contribution limit for 2021 is $19,500.

** If you have a high deductible health plan you may be eligible for a Health Savings Account (HSA). If you do have the ability to fund one of these accounts, you should do so AFTER receiving the full employer match from your 401k (if available) and BEFORE maxing the rest of your 401k. The HSA contribution limit for 2021 is $3,600. It is extremely important to understand why and how an HSA can help fund your retirement.**

The next account to utilize is a Roth IRA. A Roth provides the opposite tax benefits that a 401k does. You contribute post tax money into your Roth and then at age 59 1/2 when you withdraw your money it is tax free. Another benefit of a Roth is that any contribution that you make can be withdrawn at any time tax and penalty free. The Roth IRA annual contribution limit for 2021 is $6,000.

The final investment vehicle to utilize is a taxable brokerage account. This account provides no tax benefits. Money is taxed going in and coming out. This account provides the most flexibility in that it has the least amount of restrictions. There are also no annual contribution limits. You are also able to utilize tax saving strategies within this account, such as tax loss harvesting.

To recap, contribute enough into a 401k to receive the full employer match, max out your HSA (if applicable), max out 401k, max out Roth IRA and then everything past that will go into a taxable brokerage account. For 2021 this would look something like, $19,500 into your 401k, $6,000 into your Roth IRA and then $10,000 into your taxable brokerage account, assuming no HSA option.

Now What?

You may be wondering how long you need to stay in this loop of tracking your expenses, updating and managing your emergency fund, managing your debt and investing? Fortunately, I have a very simple answer. You can even start to get an idea of the answer after you’ve completed the very first step in our FI order of operations. The answer is the 4% rule.

The 4% rule is nothing more than a simple drawdown strategy. This rule says that you can withdraw 4% of your investments each year, indefinitely. Some people adjust this rule based on risk tolerance. For example, 3.5% for someone who is more conservative, 4.5% for someone who is willing to take on a bit more risk. I’m comfortable with 4%, personally. The reason this helps us is because it allows us to project how much we will need to retire early.

**The 4% rule was created by financial planner William Bengen in a study that is know as the Trinity Study. The goal was to find a safe withdrawal rate so that retirees wouldn’t outlive their savings. During this study, specific asset allocations were used in determining the chances of success of different portfolios of 30 year time periods. For example, it was shown that a portfolio consisting of 75% stocks and 25% bonds had a 98% chance of survival over a 30 year period. A portfolio consisting of 25% stocks and 75% bonds had an 87% chance of survival over a 30 year period. The reasons I’m telling you this are one, the 4% rule will vary based on asset allocation and two, the 4% rule only measures past performance and does not guarantee success in the future. Having said that, the 4% rule is a great guide and starting point to determining a “safe” withdrawal strategy.**

There are a few different ways to utilize the 4% rule. The first way to use this rule is by taking your annual expenses and multiplying by 25. For example, $30,000 per year in annual expenses multiplied by 25 = $750,000. According to the 4% rule you would need $750,000 in investments to pay your expenses.The second way you can use this rule is by taking your total investments and multiplying by .04 (4%). For example, you have $750,000 in investments, multiplied by .04 = $30,000. According to the 4% rule you have enough invested to pay $30,000 worth of expenses each year. These two methods work great for current scenarios. But often with FI, we are never satisfied with our current scenarios.

Luckily, the 4% rule allows for these calculations in the same way. Rather than using current expenses, project an expense number that you think you will need in early retirement. You may have $30,000 per year in expenses now but by the time you are ready to retire early your mortgage may be paid off and drop your expenses to $24,000. Conversely, you may want to up that $30,000 per year to $40,000 to allow for a $10,000 travel budget. Alternatively, you can use the investment numbers in the same manner. How much would $1,500,000 invested earn me? $60,000, great, what about $2,000,000? $80,000, fantastic. As with many things FI, the numbers that you land on will be entirely personal preference.

Overview

Financial independence can seem like an impossible feat, but by using these simple steps in an effective way it can become much less daunting. Remember, start by tracking your expenses and saving an emergency fund, 3-6 months of expenses. Then pay off your high interest debt, 7%+, and finally start investing in the most efficient accounts. Finally, use the 4% rule to plan your eventual escape and early retirement. Combined these steps form my silly order of operations acronym that I’ve deemed TEFHIDI (Teff-he-dee).

Disclosure: We may receive a referral fee if you sign up with a service through a link on this page.

I use Personal Capital to track my net worth. It’s phenomenal, honestly. I login almost daily to keep an eye on things. If you want to check it out, use my link to sign-up here. (It’s free)

What I’m currently reading:

Just about everyone has to deal with debt in one form or another. Whether it be student loans, credit cards, auto loans or mortgages. In the journey to financial independence debt is a hurdle that usually needs to be overcome before committing to early retirement. The debt snowball and the debt avalanche are two popular methods to tackle debt. 

What is The Debt Snowball?

The debt snowball is a debt reduction strategy that begins by paying the account with the smallest balance first while making the minimum payment on larger balances. To do this, list all of your debts including balance owed and the minimum payments. Find your lowest balance debt and start putting any extra money towards that debt. When you knock off your first, smallest balance you then start paying off the next highest debt. You start to gain momentum as your smaller debts get paid off and those minimum payments are applied to your larger balances. 

Let’s consider a scenario where one has student loans, credit card debt and an auto loan.

Student loans: $8,000 balance, $50 minimum payment. (6% interest)

Credit card debt: $10,000 balance, $75 minimum payment. (24% interest)

Auto loan: $15,000 balance, $250 minimum payment. (3% interest)

Let’s also assume that this person has an extra $300 per month allocated to pay down their debt. According to the debt snowball method, this person will pay $350 per month on their students loans because this is the lowest account balance. They will also pay the $75 and $250 minimum payments for their credit card and auto loan, respectively.

When their student loans are paid off, they will take the $350 that they were paying towards them and pay that towards their next highest balance, their credit card. They will now be paying $425 per month towards their credit card and the minimum payment of $250 for their auto loan.

When their credit card is paid off, they will take the $425 that they were paying towards it and pay that towards their next highest balance, their auto loan. They will now be paying $675 per month towards their auto loan. 

As more loans are paid off, more momentum is gained reducing the time it will take to pay off the next loan. 

What is The Debt Avalanche?

The debt avalanche is a debt reduction strategy that begins by paying your highest interest rate debt first, while making minimum payments on your other debts. To do this, list all of your debts including minimum payments and interest rate. Find your debt with the highest interest rate and start putting any extra money towards that debt. When you knock off your first, highest interest rate debt you then start paying off the next highest interest rate debt. Like with the Snowball method you start to gain momentum as your debts are paid off.

Let’s consider the same scenario as the snowball method with the student loans, credit card debt and auto loans.

Student loans: $50 minimum payment, 6% interest. ($8,000 balance)

Credit card debt: $75 minimum payment, 24% interest. ($10,000 balance)

Auto loan: $250 minimum payment, 3% interest. ($15,000 balance)

This person also has the same $300 per month extra to pay down debt. According to the debt avalanche method, this person will pay $375 per month towards their credit card because this is the account with the highest interest rate. They will also pay the $50 and $250 minimum payments toward their student loans and auto loan, respectively.

When their credit card is paid off, they will take the $375 that they were paying towards it and pay their next highest interest rate debt, their student loans. They will now be paying $425 per month towards their student loans and the minimum payment of $250 for their auto loan.

When their students loans are paid off, they will take the $425 that they were paying towards them and pay their next highest interest rate debt, their auto loan. They will now be paying $675 per month towards their auto loan. 

What’s the difference?

While these two debt reduction methods are similar in concept they can vary greatly in results. You’ll notice that the debt snowball method focuses on balance remaining and minimum payments while the debt avalanche method focuses on minimum payments and interest rates. The minimum payment figure is less important than the total balance and interest figures, since these figures are what dictate which order debt will be paid.

For efficiency the debt avalanche wins. If your goal is to pay off your debt as quickly as possible and pay the least amount of interest then the debt avalanche is for you. That’s not to say that the debt snowball is worthless. Paying off debts is empowering and by paying small debts first you may get a morale boost that may have taken longer to achieve with the avalanche method. There is a certain intrinsic value that can be attributed to paying off a debt.

Which method do you prefer to pay off debt?

Disclosure: We may receive a referral fee if you sign up with a service through a link on this page.

Check out Personal Capital to track your net worth. It’s phenomenal, honestly. I login almost daily to keep an eye on things. If you want to check it out, use my link to sign-up here. (It’s free)

What I’m currently reading:

There are seven tax brackets for the year 2021: 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35% and 37%. The income thresholds are adjusted each year for inflation based on the Chained Consumer Price Index. 

2021 Federal Income Tax Brackets and Rates for Single Filers, Married Couples Filing Jointly, Married Couples Filing Separately and Heads of Households

2021 Federal Income Tax Brackets and Rates for Single Filers, Married Couples Filing Jointly, Married Couples Filing Separately and Heads of Households

2021 Standard Deduction

2021 Standard Deduction

2021 Long-Term Capital Gains

Long-term capital gains are taxed at a different rate than ordinary income. Here are the brackets for 2021:

2021 Long-Term Capital Gains

2021 Annual Gift Exclusion

$15,000 of gifts to any person are excluded from tax. For 2021, the exclusion is $159,000 for gifts to spouses who are not United States citizens.

Disclosure: We may receive a referral fee if you sign up with a service through a link on this page.

Check out Personal Capital to track your net worth. It’s phenomenal, honestly. I login almost daily to keep an eye on things. If you want to check it out, use my link to sign-up here. (It’s free)

What I’m currently reading:

A large income isn’t the only determining factor in the ability to achieve financial independence. The claim that it isn’t possible to achieve financial independence because of a lack of income certainly could be true, but this isn’t usually the case. While it’s true that making more money and saving more could allow one to achieve this state faster, that doesn’t mean that it is impossible to achieve at all. It is even possible to achieve financial independence faster than someone who makes more and saves less.

Take Home Pay

In this example we’ll take a look at the differences between Jack and Jill’s gross and net income, ignoring any potential state income tax and only focusing on the federal. Jack, who makes $100,000 before tax (gross) will end up with roughly $81,710.50 after paying federal income tax (net). Jill, who makes $50,000 before tax (gross) will end up with roughly $43,060.50 after paying federal income tax (net). So even though there is a $50,000 difference in gross income between the two, the net income is a difference of $38,650. Granted, this is still a significant amount of money, it does level the playing field a bit. What makes an even larger difference is how they decide to spend or save this money.

Marginal Tax Bracket

It’s important to understand how to arrive at the $81,710.50 and $43,060.50 net income numbers. There is a common misconception when it comes to tax brackets. It is often thought that if one were to earn just $1.00 above their current tax bracket that their entire income will be taxed at the new higher tax rate. This isn’t the case. Just the amount earned into the next bracket will be taxed at the increased rate. For example, Person A is a single filer and made $38,701 this year. The top of the 12% tax bracket is $38,700. They will be taxed $4,453.50 for the $38,700 and then they will pay 22% on anything above $38,700 up to $82,500. So they will pay 22% on the $1.00 amounting to $0.22 for a total of $4453.72. 

Be More Like Jill

If Jack, who nets $81,710.50 per year, saves just 10% of his income he would be saving $8,171.05 per year. If he invested this money for 10 years and earned a 6% return this would grow to $128,796.10. Not bad! If Jill, who nets $43,060.50 per year, saves 50% of her income she would be saving $21,530.25 per year. If she invested this money for 10 years and earned the same 6% return her money would grow to $339,370.36. This is 163% more than Jack would have after 10 years! That’s pretty impressive.

I know a lot of people think saving 50% of their income isn’t possible (it absolutely is), but here’s another less dramatic example. If Jill saved half of that, just 25% of her income, she would be saving $10,765.13 per year. After 10 years at 6% that would grow to $169,685.26. This is still almost 32% more than Jack would have after 10 years.

What Are Your Goals

As you can see it’s not necessarily how much money you make, rather what you save. Cutting expenses, managing money and saving more in general can increase the time taken to reach financial independence. Personal goals will dictate how much can be cut and what must be budgeted for. The real question is what brings you value? Do you have any daily habits that are able to be cut? Maybe buying fast food type lunch everyday, morning coffee, lottery tickets, etc. Are these things truly adding happiness and value to your life?

Take a hard look at where you’re spending money and evaluate how much value your purchases are bringing you. Spend money on the things that truly make you happy. To me, financial independence is the best way to spend my money. It may take 10, 15 or even 20 years to achieve, but in the end I will have purchased the most powerful asset, time. Time to do the things that do bring value and happiness. Like spending time with family or quitting your job and pursuing your passions, even if it doesn’t pay well or even at all.

What percentage of your income are you saving?

They say that the average millionaire has seven streams of income. I’m not sure who “they” are but it’s an interesting concept nonetheless. I’m also not sure if this magical seven number is anywhere near accurate but having multiple streams of income is certainly advantageous. To understand how to acquire multiple income streams we need to identify the different types of income.

Earned Income

There are two ways to get earned income. Either by working for someone or working for yourself. In either case, income that you actually work for. The downside to earned income is that it is limited by time. You can have multiple earned income streams but you are limited by a 24 hour day. Earned income jobs are typically paid by the hour further limiting your earning potential. To earn a decent earned income wage you’re likely going to need to work full-time, committing at least 8 hours per day to a single stream of income. This is generally someone’s primary, if not their only stream of income. 

Passive Income 

Unlike earned income, there are hundreds if not thousands of ways to earn passive income. Passive income is earned with little or minimal work involved. Some popular examples of passive income streams are rental property income, interest from a bank account, and of course, dividends from an investment account. The biggest advantage to passive is that you can be earning income from 10 different streams all at the same time, even while working for your earned income. Passive income is a great way to supplement your earned income simply because it’s so hands off.

Balance Is Key

Most of us aren’t yet fortunate enough to live solely off our passive income. Until we can build our passive income streams up enough to support our lifestyle we need to find a balance between earned income and passive income. Building these passive income streams are usually done by using the income from our earned income streams. This is limiting in the same way that earned income limits our earning potential. Fortunately, as we consistently fuel these passive income streams our income as a whole grows. This allows us more opportunity to grow our passive income streams. Early on, cutting expenses, working overtime or even a side job can help get our passive income streams up and running.

Room For Growth

There’s a good reason why most millionaires have multiple streams of income. Unfortunately, becoming a millionaire with only a typical earned income will likely never happen. The beauty of passive income is that it generally has a much larger margin for growth. Things such as stock appreciation, dividend growth and appreciation on property can all dramatically increase your net worth. Making it possible for someone with an average earned income to become a millionaire too. Whether or not seven is the end all be all number of income streams for becoming a millionaire, creating multiple streams of income is extremely important for financial success.

What is your favorite type of passive income?